A paper I wrote with
Paul Thagard has been accepted for publication in Philosophical Psychology:
Abstract. The ultimatum game is a simple bargaining situation where the behavior of people frequently contradicts classical game theory. Thus, the commonly observed behavior should beconsidered irrational. We argue that this putative irrationality stems from a wrong conception of metanormativity (the study of norms about the establishment of norms). After discussing different metanormative conceptions, we defend a Quinean, naturalistic approach to the evaluation of norms. After reviewing empirical literature on the ultimatum game, we argue that the common behavior in the ultimatum game is rational and justified. We therefore suggest that the norms of economic rationality should be amended.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments posted on Natural Rationality are moderated and will be approved only if they are on-topic, not abusive and if they conform to the comments policy. Please be concise and polite. -- Thanks, Benoit.